Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
- Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
- Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
- Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
- Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 11:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info Mark Twain photo portrait. Created by Unknown - uploaded by Grendelkhan - partially restored by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Calling for Adam Cuerden to help to complete this restoration. -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 22:19:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The entire decoration of the apse dates back to around the mid-6th century (549 consecration). This picture was created by stitching 32 photographs, 4 rows and 8 columns. As it is a very large image, it's easier to browse it with ZoomViewer. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but technically not perfect due to strange camera settings. Did you use a tripod?!--Uoaei1 (talk) 11:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Inside the basilica it is forbidden to use the tripod. Yes, you're right, camera settings chosen are not ideal. I tried to perform the only possible parameters with the Canon lens available to me for photography, trying to keep my hand still and photographing several photos. The bright parts (enlightened by the two windows at the top) are very beautiful, however the ones in the shade are not perfect, which fortunately are at the edges of the photo... To conclude, the good thing is that the mosaic tiles which measure between 1⁄2 and 1 inch square, can almost all be seen quite well, because I positioned myself at an appropriate distance in the center of the basilica, 30 meters from the apse mosaic, also considering the height of the ceiling which is 30 metres too. Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 21:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support If it were better developed this image would really be a gem, but due to the size of the JPG and evaluating what the RAW would be like, this photo should have greater potential. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand well, Wilfredor is not very happy that the image wheighs "only" 16.11 MB and is saying that I should have uploaded a version that weighs more MB. It is true that I uploaded a version that was compressed with Photoshop to a quality of 11 out of 12. But I strongly disagree with his statement for many reasons :
- 1) The rules don't forbid small jpg compression (they only forbid strong compression). Actually the rules even recommend using a jpg compression of minimum 80 or 90% and this is what was done here with a 92% compression ;
- 2) A compression of 11 out of 12 has a result of pratically no difference compared to a 12/12 quality export. Even zooming at 200% and comparing pixel by pixel I never saw any difference between the two with the naked eye ;
- 3) Usually I only do the 11/12 instead of letting the 12/12 when the image size is above 20 MB. Excessive file sizes are bad for many reasons ;
- 4) Wiki Commons has available storage issues and uploading files with excessive size will only make it worse ;
- 5) Excessive file size will take a lot longer to load for people with slow internet ;
- 6) Excessive file size might make some old smartphones crash when opening the file ;
- 7) Excessive file size is bad for bandwidth and will slow down the server ;
- 8) Many of my images have been loaded more than 1 million times per file, if you multiply this number with excessive file size it would be a waste of bandwidth. Examples : 4M views in 4 years, 2.6M views in 1 year, 1.4M views in 1 year, 2.1M views in 1 year 2.3M views in 1 year, etc.
- 9) If there was a policy of only accepting only loseless uploads we would only be uploading PNG format, which is not the case here and is on the contrary to be avoided.
- Best regards, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fine, nice colors. --Mile (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by FBilula - uploaded by FBilula - nominated by FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good composition, but DoF too small. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 09:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting and composition. The leading (meandering) line of the path towards the steep hill in the background adds invokes, to me at least, a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus. A compelling image --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
- Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here really isn't working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
- Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the internal mosaic of the apse where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 06:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
- Info 101 year old Högalidskyrkan in winter. No FP of this church in Stockholm. All by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too soft and too much sky --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good light but a common motif. I also agree with Uoae1.--Ermell (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice light as Ermell says, but I also agree that the composition and sharpness are not up to FP level, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thank you everyone for the constructive criticism. Will be back with other candidates :) -- ThibautRe (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 01:50:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
- Info Sleepy male mandarin duck (Aix galericulata) in eclipse plumage (outside of breeding season). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love him Henrysz (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 21:40:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Angle and composition don't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 15:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info Gschnitzer Tribulaun and Goldkappl seen from the Pflerscher Scharte, Stubai Alps, Tyrol, border Austria/Italy. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition, interesting mountains. Yann (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Yann, well depicted, interesting point of view. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good exposure, the image captures the texture of the subject and documents the glacial striation on the peak behind it. What is the obelisk, what is on the plaque, and what kind of bird is soaring above? --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 10:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Chromatic abberations everywhere... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical it doesn't meet the FP standards. Motf is not that breathtaking.--Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The colors are gorgeous but the picture is quite noisy and a bit soft. Sorry. -- ThibautRe (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's like starring into a wall; nothing exciting about that. Wolverine XI 20:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 13:56:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
- Info created by Roger Kastel, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic film poster. Due to copyright, very few documents from this period. -- Yann (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support the movie is free too? --Wilfredor (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. You need to pay some cash. Wolverine XI 20:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary movie poster for its era. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 12:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main altar and tabernacle of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Kudos to the responsible people for the tasteful lighting; kudos to Poco for the excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
- Info Stained glass dome in the Royal Portuguese Cabinet of Reading, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality and interesting perspective. BigDom (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A stunning place. The author wanted to show the beautiful galleries with their innummerable books, the chandelier, and the glass dome — all in a single photo. This is much and has led to an unusal, somewhat forced perspective which unavoidably causes significant distortions; personally I may have preferred separate photos of the various elements; but I must also admit that the result is exciting and impressive, and the difficult contrast between very dark and very bright elements has been handled successfully, so IMHO the photo deserves the star. Wilfredor has carefully reduced the noise and improved the sharpness, thanks for that. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Pycnonotidae (Bulbuls)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support sharp photo, evenly exposed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High-quality bird image. Wolverine XI 20:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also very nice composition, reminds me of the beautiful painted illustrations in some old biology books. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great capture! High level of detail, good focus and interesting action -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose composition feels unbalanced Henrysz (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks too distorted and unnatural in my eyes, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 04:16:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Verbenaceae
- Info Seed formation of a Verbena hastata. Focus stack of 50 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support One important task of photography is to show people that some things they see everyday without really looking at them can be very interesting and beautiful; your plant photos are excellent examples for that task. – Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Young Coati.png, featured
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 22:53:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Procyonidae_(Raccoons_and_Allies)
- Info There are currently no FPs of the genus Nasua. Created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice posture, excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas cute subject. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support that is...adorable, to say the least. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could be jpg --Wilfredor (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:37:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
- Info Warsaw Presidential Palace, with the statue of Jozef Poniatowski in front. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support verticals need fix, see the windows in the right side --Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Will fix shortly. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites talk | 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent! Wilfredor (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Stitching prpblems in the roof, see note. Not sure about CAs. Motif is great. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh nooo. Ok thanks for the note; I'll fix tomorrow. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination It doesn't look like I'll have time to properly fix this quickly, so withdrawing and will renominate later. Thanks, all. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
post-withdrawal votes
|
---|
|
File:Rat des sables diurne Boughrara.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Muridae (Murids)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would have liked to see him sniffing a flower or dancing, but I'm happy to see him meditating. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support With a poetic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support As Aristeas said. There is an ethereal quality to this image with soft foreground and background elements creating something of a bokeh vignette. Meanwhile, the subject is in good lighting with sharp detail. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
- Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It was in his house, it was "normally" - in dzezva. Sand perhaps in desert, on dry camels waste. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 08:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
- Info Panoramic view from Ulrichsberg in SSE direction to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and high-quality panorama, very educative. I love how the clouds appear nicely draped over the mountains. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas and well handled. Panorama-stitching can be very tough, but this result is top tier. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 06:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 22:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Raimundo Madrazo - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like at least one error added in the restoration process. Added a note. In a couple other places it looks like a mark may have been modified rather than removed. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Rhododendrites: fixed the annotation you did and anothers I found, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 20:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, the second bird isn't sharp and not in focus Ezarateesteban 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree – worst case be the second bird can be cropped. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Some px on both side would be helpfull, especially on right side since that bird is in focus. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Agree with Mile. And definitely don't crop -- the photo is about a confrontation. Regarding sharpness of the egret, it is in a middle-ground area where it would be better for it to be blurrier or sharper, but I enjoy the drama of the heron's pose. All-in-all that brings me to neutral. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The main subject is the heron so I have no problem with the egret beeing out of focus. Also I think that the egret adds to the scene because it's looking at the heron -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice focus control. ★ 01:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 14:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 00:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's undoubtedly a useful pic, but no FP for me. Because of chromatic aberrations and perspective distortion I would not even promote it as QI. And overall the composition seems a bit unbalanced, with the harsh shadow at the right, the scaffold-like structure at the bottom. Sorry --A.Savin 06:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per A.Savin --Tagooty (talk) 01:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin --Milseburg (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- Karelj (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende 01.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 00:27:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 00:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light! ★ 21:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose good image, but not sufficiantly special. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 11 Sep → Mon 16 Sep Thu 12 Sep → Tue 17 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Wed 18 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Thu 19 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Fri 20 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Sat 21 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 07 Sep → Mon 16 Sep Sun 08 Sep → Tue 17 Sep Mon 09 Sep → Wed 18 Sep Tue 10 Sep → Thu 19 Sep Wed 11 Sep → Fri 20 Sep Thu 12 Sep → Sat 21 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Mon 23 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Tue 24 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Wed 25 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.