User talk:Túrelio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.


noframe
noframe
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

Please keep discussions together:

  • If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
  • If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018), Archive14 (2019), Archive15 (2020), Archive16 (2021), Archive17 (2022), Archive18 (2023).




My picture is not taken from that page tho

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=356385554 the image I uploaded is from a document I procured from my btl profile. It's the same info, but it's not taken from there. It's a screenshot from a document available only to me. Benderbr (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

[edit]

Hello I have uploaded a new photo of this file with higher quality, if possible, please delete this file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat_production_by_country_2022.jpg

substitute of file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat-production.png

And if possible, delete this file as well https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corn_production_by_country_2022.jpg

substitute of file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corn_production.png Matinmatinmm (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file

[edit]

Why'd you delete File:Special Education school in the Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation.jpeg under G3? I only blurred out the faces as a privacy protection. Ogundareibrahim123 (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ogundareibrahim123,
the image had been G3-tagged by User:ДолбоЯщер, which might have been not the optimal choise. However, I would have deleted it as being out of COM:SCOPE, as surely nobody would have used it. In addition, putting a "handycapped"-icon onto the faces of these people might be well seen a personality-rights violation, even if that was not your intention. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Of CC0 1.0 Image

[edit]

Hello, I am writing to ask why this image was deleted: c:File:Michael Lucas Puerto Vallarta 2023 (Photo By Mano Martinez).jpg

The file has a CC0 1.0 license applied to it.

Michael Lucas (Puerto Vallarta, 2024) by Mano Martinez is marked with CC0 1.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

https://www.lucasentertainment.com/meet-the-lucasmen/michael-lucas-during-a-puerto-vallarta-2023-production-by-mano-martinez/

~~~~ BlackNYer (talk) 13:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BlackNYer,
my bad. Seems I overlooked the license on the source-site. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated image

[edit]

Guten Abend Túrelio. I would like to ask you a question. Yesterday I mistakenly uploaded an image that I had already uploaded a year ago (here the original and here the repeated version). What is the procedure to delete the second image? Dank im Voraus. CFA1877 (talk) 11:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CFA1877, you want to have File:Huelva - 49960418776.jpg, right? --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, that's right. CFA1877 (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank ;) CFA1877 (talk) 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MIstaken deletion of File:Codigo-aflaf-placa-sinalizacao-estado-sao-paulo-lei-13541-proibido-fumar-lei-antifumo.svg

[edit]

I'm pretty sure this and that was a mistake - the file is indeed a dupe of File:Test.svg, but only for now. Undo it, please - Gabuxae (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes. This resulted from an erroneous dupe-tagging by the dupe-bot. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you.. Reverted one more instance - Gabuxae (talk) 07:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken categorical deletion

[edit]

The files that were originally posted to Category:Washington Commanders at New York Jets, 20 August 2024 (Preseason) were deleted after a move to Category:Washington Commanders at New York Jets, 10 August 2024 (Preseason). Dissident93 (talk) 15:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give an example for the allegedly wrongly deleted files? --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Preseason Week 1- Commanders at Jets - 53916585297.jpg Dissident93 (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you had tagged it for speedy-deletion by yourself, which I have performed under the G7-rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I assumed that would delete the old category and not the files tagged within it. Dissident93 (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, 41 files restored. Next time, be a bit more careful please. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lee Young-kyoung.png

[edit]

Hi,

Is this a re-uploaded image of File:Lee_Young-kyoung.jpg ? 0x0a (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

license

[edit]

Hello Túrelio,
[1] the license is at the bottome of description of source page..
--Gpkp (talk) 08:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are correct. Seems I overlooked it as it's placed at the deepest end of that page. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Túrelio. I got worried as there were 50+ uploads from the same source with a possibility of getting nominated. --Gpkp (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+++Regards

[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Thank you for your attention to detail on Wikipedia. However, I would like to clarify a couple of points regarding the removal of my profile picture.

The image I used is a promotional touristic photograph of the Kingdom of Spain and, as such, is under a license that allows its free use without copyright restrictions. Therefore, it does not infringe any laws or regulations.

It is common to find images used in various contexts, including personal profiles on platforms like Wikipedia. In fact, your profile picture can also be found on other websites.

I invite you to review the following page for more information on the license of the image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EselEttalerMuehle_1092.jpg

I hope this explanation clarifies the situation.

Thank you very much for your time and understanding. AM AtlasMarck (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AtlasMarck,
assuming you are relating to File:F1jWKFSX-oAE-9HB.jpg: you uploaded it on August 7th, while it was uploaded to gay.it already in June (https://www.gay.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/gran-canaria-10-borghi-da-visitare-1200x675.jpg). Nevertheless, you claimed it as "own work". In addition, your conclusion "promotional touristic photograph" thereby "allows ... free use without copyright restrictions" is without base in fact. If taken as fact, it needs evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erste Bank Open

[edit]

Hi, ich hatte nicht vor, das File, dass der verifizierte Benutzer Emotion Group unter seinem Benutzernamen hochgeladen hat, jetzt gelöscht zu bekommen, weil er sich in den Exif-Metadaten e|motion schreibt und ich das (ohne Auftrag) leichtsinnig in die Autor-Information übernommen habe. Ich habe eigentlich keinen Zweifel, dass das dasselbe ist. Ailura (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Ailura,
Danke für das zwischenzeitliche Verlinken der betroffenen Dateien. Da ich relativ viel lösche, ist es ziemlich mühsam, das über die Log-Liste herauszufinden, zumal wenn die Löschung schon einige Stunden zurückliegt. Es geht also um:
Wenn du den Eindruck hast, dass die Uploads in "guter Absicht" erfolgt sind, weil du den Uploader schon "kennst" oder betreust, dann bitte ihn doch einfach, für beide Dateien eine formelle Genehmigung, idealerweise vom tatsächlichen Fotografen an OTRS zu schicken. Wenn er das zusagt, kann ich die beiden Dateien entlöschen und mit OTRS-pending markieren. Grundsätzlich ist es so, dass auch bei verifizierten Benutzern nicht einfach davon ausgegangen wird, dass die Rechte für alle Uploads schon vorliegen (hatte ich früher auch mal angenommen, wurde aber eines besseren belehrt). --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gelöschte Files zu finden, wenn man keine erweiterten Rechte hat, ist auch nicht so einfach. Ich frag mal an. Nur nochmal zum Verständnis: Wenn der Benutzer verifiziert ist, muss er für Werke, die er als eigene angibt und bei denen er u.a. in den Exif-Metadaten steht trotzdem eine formelle Genehmigung schicken? Ailura (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, genau; mit Ausnahme der Anmerkung zu den Exif-Daten, das hatte ich selbst noch nicht. Das kommt von den OTRS- bzw. VRT-Kollegen (zähle ich nicht dazu), die sich um Genehmigungen kümmern; ggf. kannst du vorab, z.B. Kollegen User:Krd, wegen der Exif-Besonderheit nachfragen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

Hi, All three accounts are belong to (Sockpuppetry) one person. This person are uploading promotional files in Wikipedia. Yesterday all uploads were deleted by you. But today user uploaded again the same files with different names. Please block all three accounts in commons and delete all new promotional uploads

deleted file are (my 21 August edtions)

Thanks.[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IceCool.png

[edit]

Hi
You deleted this image with stated reason being: "twitter doesn't appear to license freely".
The twemojis are released under a CC-BY license. (If you had looked at my latest edit on that page, you would have found out about it and maybe you wouldn't have deleted it.)
regards
Emdosis (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Emdosis: Sorry, I had not seen that page. Barring a reply here from Túrelio, please post this on COM:UDEL.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Restored. Sorry, I had overlooked the license at github. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's all good 👍. Emdosis (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential copyvio farm

[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I noticed you deleted File:Rescuer onlooker at the landslide location on 01 August 2024.jpg after finding out it was a copyvio. I was looking into this user due to some disruption on en.wiki, and in addition to the copyright notices on their talkpage File:Participants in first summit.png seems to be taken directly from this site. The two current socks that have uploaded images are here and here. I actually tineyed them before I knew they were socks, and didn't find anything, but since becoming aware of the larger pattern the uploads seem potentially concerning. Best, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unberechtigte Löschung

[edit]

Hallo,

du hast heute ein hochgeladenes Foto "BONEZ MC Primary.jpg" mit folgendem Grund gelöscht "Copyright violation: https://www.reddit.com/user/Bonez-MC/comments/bp3t65/luv_him/" ... der Upload des Fotos erfolgte mit Zustimmung und Wissen des Urheberrechtsinhabers / des Künstlers selbst. Warum löscht man dieses Foto und gibt als Quelle ein Bild bei Reddit an welches eine Urheberrechtsverletzung ist? Wir fordern die Widerherstellung und zukünftige Unterlassung von derartigen Mutwilligen Handlungen. Gib doch beim nächsten Mal eine Quelle an die auch den Account des Urhberrechtsinhabers zeigt und nicht die eines X-beliebigen Fake Accounts. Jaidenkioken (talk) 13:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
du hattest das Foto File:BONEZ MC Primary.jpg 1. heute hochgeladen, 2. als urheberrechtlich dein eigenes Werk deklariert und 3. angegeben es sei vom 26. August 2024.
Von einem anderen Benutzer wurde es aber auf Reddit[2] gefunden, wo es bereits vor 5 Jahren hochgeladen wurde. Damit ist zumindest deine Datierung als falsch erwiesen. Derjenige, der ein Werk als erster publiziert, gilt prima facie als Urheber. Gemäß den Commons-Spielregeln steht dein Upload daher unter URV-Verdacht und wurde gelöscht (COM:PRP).
Dein Wording "wir fordern ..." und "Zustimmung und Wissen des Urheberrechtsinhabers / des Künstlers selbst" legt zudem nahe, dass du nicht selbst der Urheber (Fotograf) bist, sondern vermutlich im Auftrag des Abgebildetenen (Agentur) tätig bist. In solchen Fällen ist es erforderlich, dass der Urheberrechtsinhaber gegenüber dem Commons:Volunteer Response Team (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org) eine formale Erklärung zur Urheberschaft /zum Nutzungsrecht abgibt und die gewählte freie Lizenz bestätigt. Diese Erklärung muss vom Urheber oder Urheberrechtsinhaber direkt an die o.g. Adresse gesandt werden (also keine Weiterleitung). Eine (deutschsprachige) Textvorlage für diese Erklärung findest du hier: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber). --Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist schon alarmierend zu sehen welche Unwissenheit hier zu Tage gefördert wird. "Derjenige, der ein Werk als erster publiziert, gilt prima facie als Urheber." Diese Aussage ist komplett falsch und basiert offensichtlich auf gefährlichen Halbwissen. Der Urheber ist derjenige der das Werk erstellt hat. Es ist dabei irrelevant ob das Werk veröffentlicht wurde oder nicht. Jaidenkioken (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Spar dir deine Belehrungen. Ich habe dir geschildert was nach unseren Regeln erforderlich ist, damit das Bild wiederhergestellt werden kann, werde mit dir aber nicht weiter kommunizieren, zumal ich im Genehmigungsprozess auf Commons nicht involviert bin.--Túrelio (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CropTool

[edit]

Since a few days Croptool is not working for me. When I go to the image I want to crop, it just leads me to the "Enter the URL or filename for an image you would like to crop." page and when I type the file name again, it just gets stuck in "File:«name of the file.jpg» found on «commons.wikimedia.org». Nothing like this happened before to me. I have tried everything, clearing the browser data and restarting but without any success. Could you please assist me in this matter or let me know what can be done. Regards JayFT047 (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually just noticed, now it is only happening with this pic where I want to extract a cropped image: File:Pakistan national football team group picture.jpg JayFT047 (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JayFT047,
sorry, but I never used this CropTool and therefore don't have any experience with it. I use the crop function of the freeware IrfanView[3]. --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weirdly it just started working now... Thanks for the recommendation anyways. Just one thing, I just uploaded this screenshot from a video from Youtube under free license. However, I have changed the aspect ratio as it is quite unfavourable because it's recorded by phone and I'm unsure if that will affect the YoutubeReview check. Could you please review it. Cheers and thank you very much JayFT047 (talk) 22:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Babalanda Joan Peace.jpg

[edit]

Hi Túrelio. Can you check to see whether File:Dr. Babalanda Joan Peace.jpg is the same as en:File:Joan Peace Babalanda.JPG? The same person uploaded both files and they might've simply reuploaded the same file locally to English Wikipedia after you deleted it from Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly Please see w:en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 August 27 where I have followed the to enWiki and suggested deletion 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images in Category:Rodrigo Beltran

[edit]

Thanks for deleting File:Chica con sombrero.jpg; however, I think you missed my comment "see also other images in Category:Rodrigo Beltran". Please could you check and delete the copyvios? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now all images tagged with no-perm or copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving and deletion of Category:Categories of Belarus by district

[edit]

Hello! You've deleted Category:Categories of Belarus by district which content was previously moved to Category:Districts of Belarus by topic without any discussion. I don't see any categories named «Districts of <Country> by topic», but plenty named «Categories of <Country> by district» (Azerbaijan, Germany, Poland etc.) Also I think category was not well moved as new category was created instead of moving previous category, so prevoius categorisation and history was lost. Should these actions be reconsidered? Red Winged Duck (talk) 10:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
the deletion was performed on request by User:Adamant1. So, while I have no problem to undelete it etc., I would recommend you to discuss the issue with said user in order that you both eventually come to an agreement. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "File:JoshuaHabkaBio-Hacking.jpg"

[edit]

Hello! Shouldn't this image be approprite to remain on the commons since on the web-site it says that the images have the Attribution 4.0 license as long as they do not have one of those QR codes?

Thanks! StructuredWookie (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Restored. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "File:Motorola moto e (2020) Front.jpg"

[edit]

Hello, this image was deleted due to an image displayed on the phone screen, but even as the central focus, you can just redact the "Friday night Funkin'" asset from the phone's display. the primary purpose of the image is to show off the specific phone model. 2603:8001:8400:DC34:8D91:1C06:45FB:BE32 05:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. But, is there really no better image of that model? I mean, if we remove the displayed icon, the remaining image shows near-to nothing. So, we can redact the icon, but is the resulting image worth the effort? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I recall it only took the portions of the screen near the sides and the rest of the image remains intact 204.100.235.147 16:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I found this photo on Flickr. At least the image in the middle would pose no problem. The left one would need further evaluation due to the screen. But not sure whether it's the right model. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1943 establishments in Ternopil Oblast

[edit]

Restore Category:1943 establishments in Ternopil Oblast. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1965 in Ternopil Oblast --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1965 establishments in Ternopil Oblast --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1943 establishments in Ukraine by region, Category:1943 in Ternopil Oblast, Category:1965 establishments in Ukraine by region. --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gefälschte Bilder

[edit]

Guten Abend Túrelio. Mal sehen, auf es:wiki wurde ein Scherz entdeckt. Hier in Commons gibt es Bilder über das vermeintliche Thema, aber man gibt keine Quellen an und ich vermute, dass es sich um gefälschte Bilder handelt. Dann... was können wir in diesem Fall tun? CFA1877 (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFA1877,
Danke für den Hinweis. Auf die Schnelle habe ich die 3 Bilder jetzt erst einmal mit {{Fact}} markiert und auf der jeweiligen Disku ein Link nach :es hinterlassen. Morgen werde ich für alle 3 einen LA stellen, in dem dann ggf. die Indizienlage diskutiert werden kann. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Prima. Danke dir. CFA1877 (talk) 20:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Намдаков Даши Бальжанович.jpg

[edit]

Hello! Is this my download? I just don't remember it. If it's really mine, can I have the text part? Insider (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, it was, though you had cropped it only.

|description=

Русский: Намдаков Даши Бальжанович

|date=2003-10-08 17:30:36 |source=File:Выставка Даши Намдакова.jpg |author=Роман Емельяненко (original), Insider (crop)

The original image had been deleted already 5 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I get it, apparently someone asked me to do it. Thank you. Insider (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anti-discrimination Students Movement procession on 2 August.webp

[edit]


How can a file under Creative Commons license be deleted for copyright infringement? On what grounds was it deleted? Was its license checked? - Ash wki (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Anti-discrimination Students Movement procession on 2 August.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ash wki (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the evidence that this photo has been put under a free license? The provided source doesn't say so. The author, who is the only who can release it under a CC-BY license, is unknown, as you claim. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting to duplicate file

[edit]

It's absolutely unnecessary: File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his family, end of 1917.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.50.3.130 (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are created automatically by the duplicate-script. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. 82.61.202.80 10:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do the same redirects with these: File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto and Shinichi Sasagawa, circa 1917-1918.jpg, File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto (right) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg, File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter.jpg? Thank you. 82.61.202.80 10:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please, read very well my instructions: it's the opposite files to be redirected. Don't do the same error and invert immediately it for "Kenkichi Tomimoto & Shinichi Sasagawa" and "Kenkichi Tomimoto (1917)". 82.61.202.80 10:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Each one of the duplicate-files were protected (likely due to previous edit-warring). Therefore I had to redirect to the protected versions, not the other way round. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Yamamoto Heikichi" is very good, with the full page and the Japanese explanation. Can you redirect "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913)" to it? Thank you. 79.16.11.68 11:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do it? 193.207.153.240 07:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged the file. --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you delete "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913)"? It's only an exactly-scaled down of "Yamamoto Heikichi". Thank you. 193.207.108.147 12:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you do it? 79.18.119.157 10:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the File:Grapefruit Juice and Medicine May Not Mix (6774935740) - en.svg

[edit]

Hello, I would like to include the Spanish version of this image, but for any reason I made a bad job. I am rather new in wikipedia and learning... Can you tell me why you delete it, please? Thanks Beatriz.V1.0 (talk) 01:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ahhh...I can see, there is an Spanish version by Victor Atallah in X. Sorry I am not in X and I have no user in this social network. How to proceed? Beatriz.V1.0 (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, by "Spanish version" you mean a version where all the text is in spanish, right? You can access content on Twitter/X without having an own account. I doubt that the text in this diagram is above threshold of originality. So, you could simply copy it. On the other hand, as the original comes from the FDA and as Spanish is a relevant language in the U.S., the FDA might themselves have a Spanish version. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, complete text in Spanish and yes, I can access the X, but I assume that X is not a confident source of information. I will try to get the files at FDA or contact them. Thanks --Túrelio. Beatriz.V1.0 (talk) 11:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Moldova (Project Lobachev).svg

[edit]

Hello! This file was initially deleted per deletion request on May 27, 2021 but was rapidly recreated without a permit on May 30, 2021 and used for cross-wiki misinformation by the now indefinitely blocked user. 81.23.165.9 09:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, I hadn't seen the past history. However, the file has now been protected by a colleague. So, before taking any action, first we need to come to an agreement/consensus. --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for answering! That protection is clearly wrong and unreasonable… But how can we come to an agreement if that colleague ignores requests? 81.23.164.45 09:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Chiedo scusa, invece che continuare a cancellarmi le foto e le modifiche che faccio, mi puoi dire dove diavolo sbaglio??? Almeno risolvo il problema una volta per tutte!!! La foto è mia, l'ho scattata io, non ci sono diritti sopra, è di libero utilizzo!! Se per cortesia mi dite COSA devo scrivere e DOVE mi fareste un favore. Continuare a cancellarmi tutto ogni settimana fa perdere tempo a me e a voi! RolanddiGilead1971 (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the most important question is whether YOU are really the photographer. I doubt that, as none of your uploads has metadata from the camera. In File:Emilie Haavi in azione con la maglia della Roma - stagione 23-24 2.jpeg you wrote "Foto scattata da un amico durante una partita di campionato e concessami in uso gratuito e libero per Wikipedia". As the other images are of a similar appearance, I assume at best that they come from the same "friend". If that is true, then 1) you cannot write "own work", and 2) your friend needs to personally confirm to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) that he/she agrees that his/her photos are released on Commons under a free license, that also allows commercial re-use. AFAIK, the same has been told to you already on your talkpage on :it.--Túrelio (talk) 11:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a duplicate

[edit]

Please undo your deletion of File:Shanshan 2024 path.png. This is not a duplicate of File:Shanshan 2024 track.png because the former uses the new track colors and the latter the old track colors, as per en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather/Colour discussions. User:Supportstorm is defying the consensus by continuing to upload old-colored tracks, which are not to be used at all on Wikipedia. Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 22:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page

[edit]

Hi!

I'm trying to develop a page for a mexican actor, why was it deleted? I was about to add IMDB and sources.

best regards Frv24 (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your userpage User:Frv24 is not the right place to write/develop a page/article about another person. Use your talkpage for that or create a subpage, such as User talk:Frv24/Fernando Veloz for example. Anyway, Commons is not the place for articles, but just for files/media.--Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Typhoon-Yagi 5.jpg

[edit]

Can you access the file? I purged the page for a few times, but at the end I only get File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public.d5/d/d5/Typhoon-Yagi_5.jpg when I clicked into the image. What problem do you think it is?廣九直通車 (talk) 09:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is shown without any problem; I now checked all resolutions. If you have a second browser on your computer, eventually try it with that one. If it works well, it might be a cache-problem of the first browser. Just try to clear its cache. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's strange. I tried my computer's Microsoft Edge and my phone's Google Chrome. None succeeded. Also the smaller resolutions returned 404 error. Maybe I'll send the matter to COM:VPT. Anyways thanks for clarifying the file is not broken.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Totentanz

[edit]

Hi Túrelio, ich habe den beschädigten Totentanz fotografiert und eine Unterkategorie angelegt, der ich die „destroyed“-Kategorie gegeben habe. Das Original wird ja wohl wieder restauriert werden … liebe Grüße aus Köln Elya (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elya, perfekt. --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted duplicate

[edit]

Thanks for deleting File:Ümminger Straße 23 4.jpg. I'm not even sure how it's possible to upload a duplicate in a batch upload from a technical point of view...

If you don't mind, I think you can also delete the file redirect that was left behind. The duplicate wasn't used anywhere, so the redirect probably won't be missed. Nakonana (talk) 11:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Túrelio&oldid=924876646"